Legal Opinion

Clay v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2013No. 61986PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Douglas, J.:

Nevada law requires a district attorney to “inform the grand jurors of the specific elements of any public offense which they may consider as the basis of the indictment.” NRS 172.095(2). In this original writ proceeding, we consider whether the district attorney violates this requirement when he or she seeks an indictment for child abuse or neglect under NRS 200.508(1) based on a nonacci-dental physical injury but fails to inform the grand jurors of the definition of “physical injury” set forth in NRS 200.508(4)(d). We conclude that regardless of the theory…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Round Hill General Improvement District v. NewmanNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. State v. Eighth Judicial District Court ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. ThompsonNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Poulos v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. FIGUEROA-BELTRAN VS. U.S. OF AMERICA (NRAP 5)Nevada Supreme Court · 2020
  2. NEWSON, JR. (VERNON) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2020
  3. THE NEVADA INDEP. v. WHITLEYNevada Supreme Court · 2022
  4. CHASING HORSE (NATHAN) v. DIST. CT. (STATE)Nevada Supreme Court · 2024
  5. PRICE (ANTHONY) v. DIST. CT. (STATE)Nevada Supreme Court · 2025

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API