United States v. Scardina
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Judge:
The appellant was convicted pursuant to his pleas of a number of offenses including specification 12 of Charge I, which was unassailed at trial and which alleges that the appellant absented himself from his place of duty at which he was required to be, namely “... the Ecology Support Division, Chief Master-at-Arms Office, Building 861, Naval Air Station, Lemoore, California.” The absence is alleged to have commenced at 1400 on 5 January 1984 and to have terminated at 0840 on 6 January 1984. We note that two other surviving specifications are similarly constructed, though not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. FeltyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. HopfUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- United States v. SheehanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. JacksonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986
- United States v. ChristyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. SmithU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. GonzalezU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
- United States v. GonzalezU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007