Legal Opinion
United States v. Van Engel
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided December 21, 1992No. 2:91-cr-00005PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
TERENCE T. EVANS, Chief Judge.
The final pretrial issue in this case is an unappetizing one; Kurt Van Engel’s motion to dismiss the indictment based on a claim that the government engaged in prosecutorial misconduct and that it abused the grand jury process. The issue has been briefed, and a hearing was conducted on the matter at the end of October. After the hearing I urged the parties to meet and try to resolve the issue. I have been advised that efforts to reach an agreement were unsuccessful. My decision on the motion follows.
Mr. Van Engel asserts seven grounds in support…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Kurt Henry Van Engel, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. EdwardsDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
- Commonwealth v. DunphyMassachusetts Superior Court · 1994