Legal Opinion

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Kurt Henry Van Engel, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 20, 1993No. 93-1184, 93-1255PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Chief Judge.

The increase in the number of federal prosecutors in recent years has brought in its train problems of quality control. These problems led the district judge in this case to dismiss a number of counts of a fraud indictment, 809 F.Supp. 1360 (E.D.Wis.1992), precipitating this appeal by the government under 18 U.S.C. § 3731 and a cross-appeal by the defendant asking us to throw out the entire indictment.

Kurt Van Engel, the defendant, a wholesale distributor of produce, fell out with his partners, Baake and Zingale. They brought civil RICO suits against him alleging as…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. Jeff BoydCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Marius CanoyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Lawrence S. BloomCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. State v. PaganoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Young v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API