Legal Opinion

United States v. Edwards

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided August 7, 2000No. 2:99-cr-00168PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

ADELMAN, District Judge.

Defendant Terri Denise Edwards challenges the sufficiency of count 4 of the superseding indictment for failure to assert an essential element of the crime. Count 4 charges Edwards with money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(a)(l)(B)(i) and 2. 1 The indictment accuses Edwards only of “conducting] a financial transaction,” in language recited from § 1956(a)(1). However, the indictment fails to allege that the transaction satisfied § 1956’s definition of “financial transaction,” which requires that the transaction affect interstate commerce.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chen v. Mayflower Transit, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API