Bergeson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
These are two cases consolidated on appeal. In the first appeal, we agree with the Minnesota Court of Appeals that the employer’s insurer was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the employee’s civil action for alleged intentional obstruction by the insurer of the employee’s claim for workers’ compensation benefits. In the second appeal, we reject the employer-insurer’s objections and agree with the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals decision awarding compensation and penalties. In other words, in both cases we affirm.
On May 17, 1978, employee Donald Bergeson…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Coleman v. American Universal Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Stafford v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. of New York, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Everfield v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Ricard v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Nunn v. Noodles & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Karst v. FC Hayer Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Karnes v. Quality Pork ProcessorsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Flaherty v. LindsaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Summers v. R & D AGENCY, INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.