Legal Opinion

Karnes v. Quality Pork Processors

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 9, 1995No. CX-93-2113PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COYNE, Justice.

We review a decision of the court of appeals holding that in a retaliatory discharge action, the district court did not have jurisdiction to rule on the validity of a release from liability contained in a workers’ compensation settlement agreement. Karnes v. Quality Pork Processors, 514 N.W.2d 597 (Minn.App.1994). We reverse the decision of the court of appeals, reinstate the decision of the trial court, and remand for further proceedings.

In 1989, while employed by Quality Pork Processors, Bonnie Karnes sustained a com-pensable injury resulting in bilateral carpal tunnel…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Franke v. Fabcon, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Doud v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Bergeson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Wallner v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Schmidgall v. FilmTec Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against StridSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Graff v. Robert M. Swendra Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. Booth v. GadesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API