Legal Opinion
Lake County v. Teamsters Local Union 223
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 27, 2006No. ERB UC-9-04; A126592PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*273WOLLIIEIM, J.
Petitioner Lake County petitions for review of an order from the Employment Relations Board (ERB) holding that a Lake County employee, Nicky Alves, was not a “confidential employee” under ORS 243.650(6).1 We affirm.
In February 2004, respondent Teamsters Local Union #223 (the union) filed a petition for clarification of the public employee status of Alves. The union contended that Alves, who was hired for the new position of associate finance director, should be included in the collective bargaining unit. In March 2004, Lake County filed an objection, arguing that the new position…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. HickmannOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Emerald Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Hatley v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Lake County v. Teamsters Local Union 223Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- NW Environ. Advocates v. DEQCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026