Legal Opinion

Lake County v. Teamsters Local Union 223

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 27, 2006No. ERB UC-9-04; A126592Published

1Opinion of the Court

145 P.3d 187 (2006)

208 Or. App. 271

LAKE COUNTY, Petitioner,

v.

TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION # 223, Respondent.

ERB UC-9-04; A126592.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, En Banc.

Argued and Submitted July 20, 2005.

Resubmitted June 7, 2006.

Decided September 27, 2006.

James E. Bailey, III, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Daniel M. Spencer LLC.

Michael J. Tedesco, Beaverton, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was the Law Office of Michael J. Tedesco.

Before BREWER, Chief Judge, and EDMONDS, LANDAU, HASELTON, LINDER, WOLLHEIM, ORTEGA, and ROSENBLUM, Judges, and DEITS,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. HickmannOregon Supreme Court · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API