Legal Opinion

State v. Dries

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 18, 2012No. 081034751; A142715Published

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree theft by receiving. ORS 164.015; ORS 164.055; ORS 164.095. ORS 164.095(1) provides that “[a] person commits theft by receiving if the person receives, retains, conceals or disposes of property of another knowing or having good reason to know that the property was the subject of theft.” (Emphasis added.) In State v. Thomas, 13 Or App 164, 171, 509 P2d 446 (1973), we held that a conviction under that statute requires a “finding of [a] defendant’s actual knowledge or belief’ that the property was stolen. On that basis, we further held…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Pereira v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. Peitsch v. KeizerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. Wilson v. WALLUSKI WESTERN LTD.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API