Legal Opinion

Cramerton Mills, Inc. v. Nathan & Cohen Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 5, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.

While the defendant Nathan & Cohen Co., Inc., has appealed from so much of the order of the Special Term as directed that the first, second, third and fourth defenses of each of the causes of action alleged in the amended complaint be stricken out of the answer of said defendant, the appellant now directs its appeal to so much of the order as directed that the first, second, fourth and sixth counterclaims be stricken from its answer. Upon this appeal the defendant, appellant apparently acquiesces in so much of the order appealed from as struck out the first, second, third and fourth…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Swain v. . SchieffelinNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Sorenson v. Keesey Hosiery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Acme Glass Co. v. Woods-Lloyd Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stott v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Walpole v. Prefab Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Asphaltic Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Ganoung v. Daniel Reeves, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1933
  5. Delo Auto Supply, Inc. v. TobinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API