Legal Opinion

Acme Glass Co. v. Woods-Lloyd Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 27, 1918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Woods-Lloyd Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Cattaraugus on the 6th day of September, 1917, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 18th day of September, 1917, denying defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

De Angeles, J.:

This is an action for breach of an implied warranty in a contract of sale.

The plaintiff is a domestic corporation whose principal place of business is in the city of Olean where it conducts one of its glass factories and employs about 100 men.'

The defendant is a foreign corporation of the city of Pittsburgh, in the State of Pennsylvania, and is engaged in manufacturing and selling flux blocks and other blocks and material used in the construction and maintenance of furnaces for melting the constituents of glass, referred to herein as glass furnaces.

The facts (some of which are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Mayor, Etc., of N.Y. v. . SEC. Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Chapman v. . FargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Bierman v. . City Mills Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hettrick Manufacturing Co. v. BarishAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1922
  2. Cramerton Mills, Inc. v. Nathan & Cohen Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Dickson v. NilesNew York Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API