Legal Opinion
Ganoung v. Daniel Reeves, Inc.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided November 22, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPrince, J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries received by plaintiff, a young lady, when she attempted to open a can of dog food purchased from the defendant corporation at one of its grocery stores. On the day of the accident plaintiff brought the can home and set it down on the table. She testified that she noticed nothing on the exterior of the can to indicate that the quality of the contents had become impaired or that there was anything wrong with it. She proceeded to open the can by inserting the point of a can opener into the top, in the customary manner. At the instant she did…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Rinaldi v. . Mohican Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Abounader v. Strohmeyer & Arpe Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Foley v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1930
- Sorenson v. Keesey Hosiery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pabellon v. Grace Line, Inc. (Coston Supply Co., Third-And-Fourth-Party Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Bernhard v. Great A. P. Tea Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1941
- Bernhard v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1941
- Pabellon v. Grace Line, Inc. (Coston Supply Co., Third-And-Fourth-Party Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951