Abrahamson v. Cummings
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior coiirt for" King county, Gay,'J., entered {January £8, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for breach of warranty.''
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
— Action'to recover damages for breach of warranty. It is admitted that, on March 19, 1910, the respondents purchased from the appellant, at Seattle, Washington, a draft horse, and paid therefor $300, receiving from appellant a written guaranty that the animal was sound and true to work. The evidence shows that, soon after the purchase, the respondents discovered that the horse was afflicted with a disease of.the hock joint, commonly called spavin. They used the horse in hauling brick from their brick yard at Georgetown to different points in Seattle, from the time of purchase till the latter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morse v. HutchinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Pitsinowsky v. Beardsley, Hill & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Merrick v. WiltseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Park v. RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Madden v. Nippon Auto Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
- Cline v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Baker Manufacturing Co. v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Connor & Groger, Inc. v. Forest Mills of British Columbia, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1919