Baker Manufacturing Co. v. Hall
Washington Supreme Court
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county, Hewen, J., entered October 8, 1917, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on promissory notes.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
In this action both parties appeal, and we will therefore designate them as plaintiff and defendants. Plaintiff sued to recover on two promissory notes, each for $220, given by defendants, payable on July 5, 1916, and August 5, 1916, respectively, with interest at eight per cent per annum and collection charge. Defendants admitted the execution and delivery of the notes and that they are unpaid. By affirmative answer and cross-complaint, they pleaded failure of consideration, and that the notes were given as a part payment for two Maney four-wheel graders *16or scrapers, which were sold by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Booher v. GoldsboroughIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Street v. ChapmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Parker v. Fenwick.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Hooper v. . StoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Sanderson v. Trump Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jesse M. Chase, Inc. v. LeonardIdaho Supreme Court · 1949