Merrick v. Wiltse
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the municipal court of Minneapolis, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtVandeeburgh, J.
Action for damages for breach of warranty of a horse. The court finds that the defendant warranted the horse to be perfectly kind and sound in every respect, and suitable for driving in the city of Minneapolis, but that, at the time of the sale, there existed some imperfection or unsoundness in his forefeet, by reason of which he was unfit for driving in the city, and which depreciated his market value in the sum of $75, which, with $23 expenses, was allowed as damages. The court also finds that, as soon as plaintiff ■commenced using the horse on the streets of this city, he became *42lame, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Muller v. . EnoNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Freeman v. CluteNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- D. M. Osborne & Co. v. PoketSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Minneapolis Harvester Works v. BonnallieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Sharon v. MosherNew York Supreme Court · 1854
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moosbrugger v. McGraw-Edison CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Miamisburg Twine & Cordage Co. v. WohlhuterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Abrahamson v. CummingsWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- McGuire v. ChambersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921