Legal Opinion

Cosentino v. Herbert H. Landy Insurance

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided September 4, 1998No. 945968EPublished

1Opinion of the Court

van Gestel, J.

This matter comes before the Court on motions by the various defendants for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. The plaintiff has moved to strike the motions as being untimely. For the reasons stated below, the plaintiffs motion is ALLOWED and the defendants’ motions are stricken.

BACKGROUND

The docket herein reflects that judgment was entered thereon on July 24, 1998. The defendants’ motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for new trial -were filed and docketed on August 17, 1998. The certificate of service on the defendants’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lewis v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Chittenden Trust Co. v. LevittMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  3. Russell v. Pride Convenience, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  4. F.W. Webb Co. v. AverettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API