Legal Opinion
Carvalho v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 3, 1989No. 87-2745PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
Raymark Industries challenges the district court’s application of the statute of limitation; submission to the jury of special *893verdict interrogatories phrased in the alternative; refusal to poll the jury on each subpart of each interrogatory; denial of Raymark’s motion for JNOY or, in the alternative, for a new trial; and imposition of a Rule 11 sanction against Raymark on Raymark’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs-appellees1 filed this action on behalf of Manuel S. Carvalho, on July 28, 1980, against twenty-seven producers and distributors of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- James E. Peterson v. Harold Kennedy, Richard A. Berthelsen, and National Football League Players AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Golden Eagle Distributing Corporation v. Burroughs Corporation, and Kirkland & EllisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. George H. Lustig, United States of America v. Gregory D. PedersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Hawaii Federal Asbestos Cases.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Agles v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1995
- In Re Hawaii Federal Asbestos Cases. Kenneth D. Cain and Sophie Cain v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Kenneth D. Cain and Sophie Cain v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, and Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992