Legal Opinion
Agles v. Merck & Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided February 1, 1995No. Civ. 93-00701 BMKPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KURREN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant MERCK & CO., INC., including its division, MERCK HUMAN HEALTH DIVISION, formerly known as Merck, Sharp & Dohme (hereinafter collectively referred to as “MERCK”) moves this court for summary judgment contending that Plaintiffs claims are barred by the statute of limitation.
For reasons discussed below, Defendant MERCK’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.
FACTS
Plaintiff Deborah Agles, a medical doctor, filed a products liability action against MERCK on March 25, 1993. She seeks to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
- Strand v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1996
- Construction Services Pacific, LLC v. Mule-Hide Products Co., Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2025