Legal Opinion

In Re Hawaii Federal Asbestos Cases. Kenneth D. Cain and Sophie Cain v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Kenneth D. Cain and Sophie Cain v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, and Owens-Illinois, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 20, 1992No. 90-16668Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

960 F.2d 152

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

In re HAWAII FEDERAL ASBESTOS CASES.

Kenneth D. CAIN and Sophie Cain, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, et al., Defendants,

and

Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Kenneth D. CAIN and Sophie Cain, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, et al., Defendants,

and

Owens-Illinois,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. James E. Peterson v. Harold Kennedy, Richard A. Berthelsen, and National Football League Players AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Stanley F. Taylor v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Smith v. Cutter Biological, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Collins v. GreensteinHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Airlift International, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation Douglas Aircraft Company McDonnell Douglas Finance Corporation and the Deutsch CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API