Legal Opinion

In re LaFond

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 1, 1986No. CX-86-83PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

On December 18, 1984, two women, T.F. and P.L., filed complaints with the Le Su-eur police chief against appellant, John La-Fond, alleging misconduct by LaFond while on and off duty. The women alleged that appellant had sexual relations with them at different times. Additional allegations surfaced regarding appellant’s unauthorized use of the municipal swimming pool.

Police Chief Thorau conducted an investigation, and, on January 18, 1985, held a hearing on the allegations. Based on the investigation, Thorau concluded that appel*322lant had committed misconduct by: engaging…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hart v. Common CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. State Ex Rel. Jenson v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. SchraderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. City of St. Paul v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Partners in Nutrition's Appeal of Disapproval of Site Expansion in the CACFP ProgramCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Partners in Nutrition's Appeal of Disapproval of Site Expansion in the CACFP ProgramCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API