Legal Opinion
Pitman v. City of Oakland
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 1988No. A034137PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENSON, J.
This appeal follows an order of the trial court dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint. A demurrer to the first cause of action was sustained without leave to amend. Demurrers to the second, third and fourth causes of action were sustained with 10 days leave to amend. Upon plaintiff’s failure to amend, the action was dismissed. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Plaintiff’s complaint alleged that plaintiff was employed by the City of Oakland as a police communications dispatcher; that on or about September 16, 1983, plaintiff, who was off-duty at the time, was cited and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Moore v. PanishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Newby v. Alto Riviera ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Caliber Bodyworks, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Calero v. Unisys Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Onelum v. Best Buy Stores L.P.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.