Legal Opinion
SHORELINE, INC. v. Hisel
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided September 25, 2003No. 13-01-621-CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice DORSEY
(Assigned).
Appellant Shoreline, Inc. (Shoreline), defendant below, appeals from a post-answer default judgment granted in the favor of appellee, Ms. Jeri Hisel, plaintiff in the trial court. By four issues, appellant complains that the default judgment is not a final judgment; the trial court erred in awarding damages; and the evidence is legally and factually insufficient. We reform the judgment to delete the award of punitive damages, and otherwise affirm.
Shoreline, a drug rehabilitation residential treatment center, employed Hisel as a caseworker. During her…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation v. AuldTexas Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Mirta Zorrilla v. Aypco Construction II, LLC and Jose Luis MunozTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Formosa Plastics Corp., USA v. Kajima International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- O'DELL v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
- SJW Property Commerce, Inc. v. Southwest Pinnacle Properties, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
- West Telemarketing Corp. Outbound v. McClure, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.