Legal Opinion
Walton v. Guidant Sales Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 6, 2006No. CIV. AMD 05-296PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVIS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Anthony Walton, acting pro se, filed this employment discrimination action against his former employer, Guidant Sales Corporation, pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213. Guidant filed a pre-discovery motion for summary judgment asserting that Walton had failed properly to exhaust his administrative remedies, i.e., he failed to file a timely charge of discrimination. I denied the pre-discovery motion without prejudice, concluding that Walton had generated a “genuine dispute of material fact…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Stan Laber v. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Mathen Chacko v. Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sewell v. Strayer UniversityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Snead v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTYDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Merchant v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Adams v. WallensteinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Taylor v. Peninsula Regional Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.