Legal Opinion
Mathen Chacko v. Patuxent Institution
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 29, 2005No. 04-1577PublishedCited by 478 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reversed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and Judge CONRAD joined.
OPINION
WILKINSON, Circuit Judge.
We must decide in this case whether the plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies, and thus properly brought suit in federal district court, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (2000). Before a Title VII plaintiff can bring a formal suit, he must file an administrative charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). This charge frames the scope of future litigation. “Only those…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by478 opinions
- Bonds v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Carolyn Sydnor v. Fairfax County, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Jones v. Calvert Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Younis v. Pinnacle Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Karen Balas v. Huntington Ingalls IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
473 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.