Commonwealth v. Tilghman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
This case presents the question of whether a common pleas court retains jurisdiction in matters regarding parole when although the maximum aggregate sentence is two or more years, each component sentence imposed has a maximum of less than two years. Our answer today, as it has been each time this issue has come before us, is no.
Phillip Tilghman was granted early parole from two consecutive sentences for robbery and conspiracy. On February 8, 1993, Mr. Tilghman entered a negotiated guilty plea in exchange for a sentence of eleven and one-half to twenty-three months’…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gillespie v. DEPT. OF CORR.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. McDermottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Abraham v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KalichakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. HansonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth, Department of Corrections v. ReeseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. McMasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.