Commonwealth, Department of Corrections v. Reese
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MUSMANNO, J.:
¶ 1 Appellants, the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (“DOC”) and Philip Johnson, Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Pittsburgh (“SCI”), appeal from Orders that granted Petitions for writs of habeas corpus filed by two prisoners, Appellees Emmitt Reese (“Reese”) and Scott Richart (“Richart”). 1 The Petitions were granted on the basis that Reese’s and Richart’s maximum prison terms had expired, and that they were therefore entitled to be discharged. For the reasons stated herein, we reverse both Orders.
¶2 The above cases have been consolidated for appeal.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Young v. Com. Bd. of Probation and ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Cox v. Commonwealth, Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. IsabellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Gillespie v. DEPT. OF CORR.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JudgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Rivera v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. StaffordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. WestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Barnhart v. KylerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.