Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kalichak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 2008No. 1201, 1202 EDA 2007PublishedCited by 261 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY COLVILLE, J.:

¶ 1 This case involves two consolidated appeals from the judgments of sentence imposed following revocation of Appellant’s probation and parole. 1 Appellant seeks to challenge the discretionary aspects of his sentence. Counsel has filed a petition to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. Califor nia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and an accompanying brief. We grant counsel’s petition to withdraw and affirm the judgments of sentence.

Facts

¶ 2 After being convicted of criminal trespass 2 and conspiracy to trespass, 3 Appellant was sentenced to incarceration…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. WrecksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. MalovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. WrecksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by261 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CartretteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. ColonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. TukhiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. MeliusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Com. v. Cooper, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

256 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API