Legal Opinion

Lorraine v. Townsend

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1925No. 4582PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeCAMANT, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Plaintiffs’ original patent was issued April 5, 1921, and was numbered 1,373,664. The plaintiff Lorraine, to whom it was issued, was dissatisfied with its form and applied for a reissue, under the provisions of section 4916 of the Revised Statutes (section 8965 of Barnes’ Federal Code, 16 Stat. 205 [Comp. St. § 9461]). The reissued patent contained claims 17, 18, and 19, which defendants are charged with infringing. Defendants contend that these claims do not cover the same invention as tho original Lorraine patent. If this contention is well taken, it is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Heald v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Powder Co. v. Powder WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Corbin Cabinet Lock Co. v. Eagle Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Parker & Whipple Co. v. Yale Clock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kalich v. Paterson Pacific Parchment Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  2. Box Patents, Inc. v. Universal Paper Box Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. E. F. Hauserman Co. v. Wright Metal, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1934
  4. Gallagher v. CooperDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API