Legal Opinion

Parker & Whipple Co. v. Yale Clock Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 31, 1887No. 18PublishedCited by 66 opinions

In equity. To restrain alleged infringement of letters-patent. Decree dismissing the bill. Complainants appealed. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatchford

This is a suit -in- equity, brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut, by the Parker & Whipple Company, a corporation of Connecticut, and Arthur E. Hotchkiss, against the Yale Clock Company, a corporation of Connecticut, and. Henry C. Shelton, Frederick A. Lane, and Paschal Converse, directors of the latter .company. The suit is founded on reissued letters-patent No. 10,062, granted March 14th, 1882, to Arthur E. Hotchkiss, for improvements in clock movements, on an application for a reissue filed July 19th, 1881, the original patent, No. 221,310,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Burr v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  4. The Corn-Planter PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Gill v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. U. S. Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Sontag Chain Stores Co. v. National Nut Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Adams Electric Ry. Co. v. Lindell Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API