Legal Opinion

Heald v. Rice

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1882No. 193PublishedCited by 78 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of California. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

This was an action at law brought by Henry W. Rice against John L. Heald to recover damages for an alleged infringement of reissued letters-patent No. 6422, granted May 4, 1875, to him for iriiprovements in steam-boilers. The original patent was No. 146,614, dated Jan. 20, 1874. The invention, as stated in the complaint, consisted, among other things, of a combination of a straw-feeding attachment with the furnace-door of a return-flue steam-boiler, for the use of straw alone as fuel, in generating steam ample for practically operating steam-engines.

The case was tried by a jury, and resulted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. Burr v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  4. Powder Co. v. Powder WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Hicks v. KelseySupreme Court of the United States · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Williams Manufacturing Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API