Legal Opinion
E. F. Hauserman Co. v. Wright Metal, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 8, 1934No. 1011Published
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
The suit is in equity for infringement of 9 several patents including 44 claims. E. F. Hauserman, plaintiff, is an Ohio corporation with its place of business located at Cleveland, in that state. Wright Metal, Inc., defendant, is a New York corporation, with its principal place of business at Falconer, in that state. Defendant Samuel J. Lasser is an assignee for benefit of creditors of Wright Metal, Inc., and is in the active conduct of the business of that corporation. The counterclaim set up in defendants’ answer has been withdrawn, and the only issue is the alleged…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Cantrell v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.