Legal Opinion
Monroe Division, Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. Frank A. De Bari
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 26, 1977No. 76-1354PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
This is a proceeding to recover damages allegedly resulting from an overly broad preliminary injunction. The district court, after entering a narrower permanent injunction, denied damages. We reverse.
Defendant-appellant De Bari was employed by plaintiff-appellee, Monroe Division, Litton Business Systems, Inc., as assistant branch manager of its Santa Fe, New Mexico, office. His employment was terminated on June 27, 1975. Monroe sued to enforce a provision of the employment contract which prohibited the employee from competing against the employer for one year after…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Continental Oil Company v. The Frontier Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Meyers v. BlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Coquina Oil Corporation, Flag-Redfern Oil Company and Yates Petroleum Corporation v. Transwestern Pipeline CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- The Continuum Company, Inc. v. Incepts, Inc., Abs Ventures Ii, and Aba Excelsior IICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Atkin, Wright & Miles, CharteredUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- The Squaxin Island Tribe v. The State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Aguinaga v. United Food & Commercial Workers International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.