Legal Opinion

Bockweg v. Anderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1993No. 7PA92PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

This case presents two issues for our review. First, we must determine whether the trial court’s denial of defendants’ motion for summary judgment based on the doctrine of res judicata is immediately appealable. If it is, we must then determine whether the trial court erred in this case by concluding that res judicata does not bar plaintiffs’ present action. While we hold that the denial of defendants’ motion for summary judgment based on res judicata is immediately appealable, we also hold that the trial court correctly concluded that the doctrine of res judicata does not bar…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering and MacHine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Harnett v. BillmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Hartsel Springs Ranch of Colorado, Inc. v. Bluegreen Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  4. Abels v. Renfro Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Country Club of Johnston County, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API