Legal Opinion

Chernow v. Feldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that it appears on the face thereof that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

When a criminal charge is sustained to the extent that a magistrate holds a defendant for the action of the grand jury, or a grand jury indicts, both of which elements were present in this case, in a*330n action for malicious prosecution, there is a prima facie showing of the existence of probable cause, and it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to rebut this showing by alleging facts involving the malicious…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hopkinson v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Green v. General Cigar Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. Brown v. BeileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kasen v. MorrellNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Berger v. American National Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Jones v. Independent Fence Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Pandolfo v. BrodellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  5. Ashlaw v. Racquette River Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API