Legal Opinion

Pandolfo v. Brodell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The allegation in the complaint that appellant had made a sworn accusation against respondent before a Judge of the District Court of Nassau County, who thereupon issued a warrant for her arrest, did not constitute an admission that there existed probable cause on appellant’s part for belief that respondent was guilty of the charge made against her, so as to require the allegation of further facts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hopkinson v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Graham v. Buffalo General Laundries Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Chernow v. FeldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Russo v. State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. Torrey v. TwifordWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Russo v. New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Torrey v. TwifordWyoming Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API