Legal Opinion
Kasen v. Morrell
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1959PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJacob J. Schwabtzwald, J.
Herein involved are motions made respectively by defendants Morrell (Charlotte S. Morrell and Samuel Morrell), defendant Cohen and defendant Harris, which I shall proceed to consider seriatim.
The motion of defendants Morrell, directed to the legal sufficiency of certain of the causes of action contained in the amended complaint, or for corrective relief, is disposed of as follows:
Paragraph 24 of said amended complaint, set forth under the ‘ ‘ Fourth Cause of Action as against the Defendant Charlotte S. Morrell,” is stricken. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 241; Rules Civ. Prac., rule 103.) It alleges…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Tilton v. . BeecherNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Hopkinson v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Graham v. Buffalo General Laundries Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Vernes v. PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Singer v. Whitman & RansomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Vereins-Und Westbank, AG v. CarterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Beatie v. DeLongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.