Legal Opinion
Futch v. James River-Norwalk, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided February 23, 1989No. Civ. A. E87-0088(L)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TOM S. LEE, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on motion of the defendant James River-Norwalk, Inc. (James River) for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The individual plaintiff Gary Futch and the corporate plaintiff Futchlock Industries, Inc. instituted this action against James River seeking damages for breach of an oral contract. 1 James River denies the existence of any contract but asserts that Mississippi’s statutes of frauds would nevertheless render any such oral contract between the parties…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Charles L. Walker v. U-Haul Co. Of Mississippi, U-Haul International, Inc. And Amerco, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- C. R. Fedrick, Inc. v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Bay Springs Forest Products, Inc. v. WadeMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- Lige Dickson Co. v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Cox v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- B & W Glass, Inc. v. Weather Shield Mfg., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Starry Const. Co., Inc. v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- T.K. Stanley, Inc. v. Scott Paper Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1992
- Wieberg v. Resthaven Gardens of Memory, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Futch v. River-NorwalkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989