Legal Opinion
C. R. Fedrick, Inc. v. Borg-Warner Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 22, 1977No. 75-1424PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EAST, District Judge:
The appellant (Fedrick) appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the appellee (Borg) entered by the District Court on the several grounds that the provision of the Statute of Frauds, California Commercial Code (C.C.C.) § 2201(1) and (2), barred Fed-rick’s action against Borg for the breach of an alleged oral bid or contract to supply and sell certain motor driven pumping units (pumps), and relief could not be granted under any theory of equitable estoppel. We affirm.
Fedrick raises two issues on review. Did the District Court err in determining that:(1) The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Yoder v. Nu-Enamel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Tiffany Incorporated v. WMK Transit Mix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Scandinavian Airlines System v. United Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- K & M Joint Venture v. Smith International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- B & W Glass, Inc. v. Weather Shield Mfg., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- United States v. H. E. Crain and Ethel E. Crain, Husband and Wife, and Coconino County, ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.