Legal Opinion

Lige Dickson Co. v. Union Oil Co. of California

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1981No. 47550-4PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals certified the following question1 to us:

Under the law of the State of Washington, may an oral promise otherwise within the statute of frauds, Wash. Rev. Code § 62A.2-201, nevertheless be enforceable on the basis of promissory estoppel? See Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 217A. See generally Klinke v. Famous Recipe Fried Chicken, Inc., 94 Wash.2d 255, 616 P.2d 644 (1980).

Our answer to this question is "no". Analysis and elaboration follow.

The business relationship between plaintiff Lige Dickson Company (or its predecessor partnership) and defendant Union…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Klinke v. Famous Recipe Fried Chicken, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. C. R. Fedrick, Inc. v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Warder & Lee Elevator, Inc. v. BrittenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  4. C. G. Campbell & Son, Inc. v. Comdeq Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  5. Klinke v. Famous Recipe Fried Chicken, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. James Casazza v. Joseph C. KiserCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  2. Berg v. TingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. B & W Glass, Inc. v. Weather Shield Mfg., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Family Medical Building, Inc. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Broad v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau, A.G.Washington Supreme Court · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API