Legal Opinion
Cox v. Cox
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 24, 1974No. SC 576PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
Are alleged oral contracts for the sale and delivery of cotton involving more than $500 enforceable ?
That is the principal question presented on this appeal. Alabama’s Uniform Commercial Code provides as follows:
“(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his authorized agent or broker. A…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cohn v. FisherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Port City Construction Co., Inc. v. HendersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Quad County Grain, Inc. v. PoeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Garrison v. PiattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Presti v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Holley Equipment Company, a Corporation v. Credit Alliance Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Reigel Fiber Corporation v. Anderson Gin Company, Reibel Fiber Corporation v. Ellis BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- B & W Glass, Inc. v. Weather Shield Mfg., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Allied Grape Growers v. Bronco Wine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.