Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Harlin v. Superior Court
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 10, 1926No. 19921. Department OnePublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.
On November 30, 1925, the city council of Seattle duly enacted an ordinance, providing for the purchase from the Seattle and Rainier Valley Railway Company of its street railway system, situated in King county, and located partly within the limits of the city of Seattle, and within a distance of not exceeding eight miles thereof outside its corporate limit's. Under the provisions of the ordinance, no general obligation was to be assumed by the city, but the system was to be paid for by the creation of a special fund to be derived from the operation of the utility in question.
Thereafter,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Peterson v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- McKevitt v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Dooling v. City CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Benton v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Durocher v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Neils v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Guthrie v. City of RichlandWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Bowen v. KruegelWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Paget v. LoganWashington Supreme Court · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.