Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Kelly
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 21, 1953PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
In this action the plaintiffs, a group of package store permittees, seek to enjoin the liquor control commission from enforcing Public Act No. 200, enacted by the 1951 General Assembly (General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1951, §§ 904b-907b). The trial court rendered judgment for the defendants and from that judgment the plaintiffs have appealed.
The act in question provides that no out-of-state shipper, manufacturer or wholesaler permittee shall sell or offer for sale any alcoholic liquor the container of which bears a label stating the brand or the name of the owner or producer, unless a schedule of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Snyder v. Town of NewtownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Allied Properties v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Tyler v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.