C. M. C. ex rel. Conway v. A. P. F.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
This is a paternity action pursuant to Minn. St. 257.251 to 257.31. The case was tried in two parts. The first part of the trial, which resulted in a finding of paternity, was tried before a jury. The second part, dealing with damages alone, was tried without a jury. Defendant raises numerous issues on appeal including whether he received a fair jury trial, whether there was sufficient evidence to support a finding of paternity, whether the court applied the proper standards in determining the amount of damages, whether the evidence supports the award, and whether the paternity statutes are…
2Cited by6 opinions
- State by Spannaus v. Century Camera, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State, on Behalf of Ortloff v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Mnd v. BmdCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Cmc v. ApfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.