Legal Opinion
Elliott v. State
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1926No. Criminal No. 620PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
— F. E. Elliott, hereinafter called the appellant, has appealed from a conviction for violation of Ordinance No. 37 enacted by the town of Somerton, Yuma county, Arizona, which reads, so far as material in this case, as follows:
“It shall be unlawful for any person . . . conducting or managing any grocery store, butcher shop, or market for the sale of meat, fish, fruit, or vegetables, dry goods store, shoe store, haberdashery, millinery establishment, lumber yard, hardware store, within the town of Somerton, Arizona, to open, keep open or allow to remain or be kept open, such store or place,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hennington v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. . HavnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Petit v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Ex parte JentzschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Two Guys From Harrison, Inc. v. FurmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Broadbent v. GibsonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. Fantastic Fair & Karmil Merchandising Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961
- State v. Karmil Merchandising Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.