Caremark LLC v. Choctaw Nation
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Caremark LLC, et al., No. CV-21-01554-PHX-SMB 10 Petitioners, ORDER 11 v. 12 Choctaw Nation, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 Pending before the Court is the Choctaw Nation’s1 Emergency Motion for Stay 16 Pending Appeal and Memorandum of Law in Support (the “Motion”). (Doc. 40.) 17 Caremark2 filed an Opposition to the Motion, (Doc. 44), and the Nation replied, (Doc. 45). 18 The parties did not request oral argument, and the Court declines to hold oral argument, 19 finding it unnecessary. See LRCiv 7.2(f). The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-BursetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Golden Gate Restaurant Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- FTC v. Qualcomm IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019