Legal Opinion

Eggena v. New York Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 8, 1945No. 46586PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, C. J.

The facts in this case are not disputed. The policy in controversy, dated February 20, 1941, is upon the life of Charlie H. Lichtsinn in the sum of $1,000, his mother, Feukea G. Eggena, being the beneficiary. As a part of the policy appellee issued to the insured its double-indemnity agreement by which it agreed to pay the beneficiary, in addition to the face of the policy, the further sum of $1,000, “upon receipt of due proof, on forms prescribed by the Company, that the death of the Insured resulted directly and independently of all other causes from bodily injury effected solely through…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stankus v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Bull v. Sun Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  3. Boatwright v. American Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  4. Field v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Vanderbilt v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cole v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  2. Youngwirth v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. Langlas v. Iowa Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  4. Hooker v. New York Life Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1946
  5. Allied Mutual Casualty Company v. DahlSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API