Legal Opinion
Bull v. Sun Life Assur. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 15, 1944No. 8369, 8370PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MINTON, Circuit Judge.
Ruth P. Bull recovered judgment in the District Court for the face value of a policy of insurance issued by the defendant, the Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, *457upon the life of her husband, Richard Bull. The defendant has appealed from the judgment.
The only question presented here is one of law, that is, the proper construction of the insurance contract. The policy at the time of its issuance was amended by endorsement to provide as follows:
“Death as a result, directly or indirectly, of service, travel, or flight in any species of aircraft, as a passenger or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pacific Union Club v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
- Commercial Union Assur. Co. v. Pacific Union ClubCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
3Cited by28 opinions
- Goforth v. Franklin Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Knouse v. Equitable Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Green v. Mutual Ben. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- Mrs. Harold S. Willingham Nee Francis S. McCall v. Life & Casualty Insurance Company of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Order of United Commercial Travelers v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.