Legal Opinion

Langlas v. Iowa Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 7, 1954No. 48457PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

— The facts before us are not in dispute. Two policies of insurance upon the life of Ervin W. Langlas, Jr., in the respective amounts of $3000 and $5000 were issued by the defendant-company during the years 1945 and 1949. The plaintiffs were the parents of the insured and were the named beneficiaries in the policies. Attached to each policy, and made a part of it, was a “Double Indemnity Certificate”, which provided the company would pay an additional sum equal to the face amount of the policy if the insured should die “in direct consequence of bodily injuries effected solely through…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. The Brig Amy WarwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  2. Western Reserve Life Insurance v. MeadowsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Bas v. TingySupreme Court of the United States · 1800
  4. Beley v. Pennsylvania Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Stankus v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bates v. United Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. Youngwirth v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. Bergera v. Ideal National Life Insurance CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Lynch v. National Life and Accident Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Jerrel v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API