Legal Opinion

Hooker v. New York Life Ins. Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 21, 1946No. 43 C 938PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

The plaintiff brings this action to recover the double indemnity benefit in the policy issued by the defendant company on the life of his son. The complaint alleges that the insured’s death occurred on May 19, 1943 in an accidental fall off a cliff. The defendant has paid the face amount of the policy, but resists payment of the double indemnity benefit on the ground that the insured’s death was within an exception to the double indemnity clause, which provided that the double indemnity benefit shall not be payable “if the insured’s death resulted, directly or…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ruddock v. Detroit Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Johnson v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Miller v. Illinois Bankers' Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  4. Stankus v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Benham v. American Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mars Steel Corp. v. Continental Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Greenway v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Tripp v. MayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  4. Carpineta v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  5. Collins v. DuffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API